Romans 2:26 - Համեմատել բոլոր տարբերակները
Romans 2:26 NIV (New International Version)
So then, if those who are not circumcised keep the law’s requirements, will they not be regarded as though they were circumcised?
Romans 2:26 ESV (English Standard Version 2025)
So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
Romans 2:26 NLT (New Living Translation)
And if the Gentiles obey God’s law, won’t God declare them to be his own people?
Romans 2:26 CSB (Christian Standard Bible)
So if an uncircumcised man keeps the law’s requirements, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
Romans 2:26 KJV (King James Version)
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
Romans 2:26 NKJV (New King James Version)
Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
Romans 2:25-29 MSG (The Message)
Circumcision, the surgical ritual that marks you as a Jew, is great if you live in accord with God’s law. But if you don’t, it’s worse than not being circumcised. The reverse is also true: The uncircumcised who keep God’s ways are as good as the circumcised—in fact, better. Better to keep God’s law uncircumcised than break it circumcised. Don’t you see: It’s not the cut of a knife that makes a Jew. You become a Jew by who you are. It’s the mark of God on your heart, not of a knife on your skin, that makes a Jew. And recognition comes from God, not legalistic critics. * * *
Romans 2:26 NASB2020 (New American Standard Bible - NASB)
So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will his uncircumcision not be regarded as circumcision?
Romans 2:26 AMP (Amplified Bible)
So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded [by God] as circumcision?
Romans 2:26 NET (New English Translation)
Therefore if the uncircumcised man obeys the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?